Make Text Larger Make Text Smaller Email this Article to a Friend Print this Article

Like father, like son in the priesthood

Published: January 13, 2009

In possibly the first such event in Britain since Pope Gregory VII imposed mandatory priestly celibacy in the Latin Church, a British man, Dominic Cosslett, has been ordained a Catholic priest - like his father, Ron.

Fr Dominic Cosslett begins his job as assistant priest at St George's Church in Worcester this week, The Independent reports.

But what makes his ordination so unusual is that his father, Ron Cosslett, is also a priest at a church just up the M5 in nearby Darlaston. He was previously an Anglican priest before converting to catholicism.

Fr Dominic, who is not married, was ordained at a packed ceremony last month at Christ the King in Coventry by Archbishop Vincent Nichols, who also ordained Father Ron three years ago.

Speaking at the ordination, Archbishop Nichols said: "This is a unique occasion and a great day in the life of the diocese. Both a father and his son, after his ordination, will be serving as Catholic priests."

But although their ordination might be deemed somewhat unorthodox in the modern Catholic Church, 900 years ago it would have been perfectly plausible. Although celibacy became an increasingly important issue for the Vatican during the 9th and 10th centuries, it was not until the First Council of the Lateran in 1123 that Rome officially declared clerical marriages invalid.

Fr Dominic originally trained for the Anglican priesthood at the high church Mirfield College of the Resurrection before being priested in 1997. He then underwent a shortened form of training to become a Catholic priest under guidelines agreed by the Vatican for the reception of Anglican clergy who defect to the Catholic Church.

In his ordination Mass booklet Fr Dominic wrote: "I especially want to thank my parents and family for the support and unwavering love they have shown me over the years."

SOURCE

Son joins his father in the priesthood (The Independent)

 

Response to articles is welcome. Simply follow the prompts to post your comment. No posting of more than 250 words will be published. While critical comment on stories and issues is welcomed, postings that descend to personal attacks on or impugn the integrity of other commentators will be blocked. Please use your own name, or initials, eg John Brown, or JB, or JAB, or Johnny. You are also required to add your location to the end of your email - as in, Sunshine, Victoria. Please provide your email address in the line supplied, followed by your contact phone number. These are requested for identification purposes only and will not be published. If you have any problems, please email news@cathnews.com

Recent Comments

  1. Instead of speaking proudly about such events, the church should feel ashamed that IT imposes celibacy on those Catholics who want to minister in the love of the Lord but cannot do so because they also feel called to marriage.The Catholic church proudly accepts anglicans (who probably cannot cope with women priests and so change to the catholic church to help continue conservatism and chauvinism within its ancient old fashioned narrow minded walls) who can continue to live a double life.
    No wonder we rarely see Catholic priests interviewed and asked their opinions now when issues arise. Like it or not, the Catholic Church has lost its credibility.
    It is time people demanded justice because the Catholic church reeks with injustice and all anyone does is ignore it. They are good at doing the ostrich act!
    In my book, the pope down is really still saying that celibacy is superior to marriage, yet, marriage is a Sacrament and one of the most important vocations in the world.

  2. I read this article with mixed sentiments. Whilst happy for the father and son combination, it saddens me to think of the numbers of both priests AND potential priests who have been lost to ministry because of the mandatory celibacy rule AND a not insignificant number of sons who like Fr. Dominic would have been inspired to follow their father's calling. If they ordained married men, not only is this theologically sanction, but there would certainly be more vocations to the priesthood. Furthermore, think of the sons who would have been so inspired by their fathers' vocations, that they too would have pursued this vocation. The estimated 80,000 priests who have been lost to ministry to get married could and would quite easily be a lot more than this if you take into account those who never pursued this vocation because of mandatory celibacy AND the sons who were never born because their fathers never had kids.

  3. I'm sure there have been numerous examples of father and son priests in Britain over the centuries, where the father was a widower. (The article doesn't mention whether Fr Ron's wife is still alive.)

  4. Gee Norma, that's 150 words from you about what's wrong with the Catholic Church. You're not doing a very good job of "ignoring" her.

    Once again for the slower students: the Church has never "imposed" celibacy on anyone nor made it "mandatory".

    Neil please explain why the Church is to blame for the (your estimate) 80,000 men who willingly and voluntarily took a vow of celibacy, then willingly presented themselves for ordination knowing full well they could never marry, and then later decided to break both of the vows they had made. Why don't you ask THEM why they were doubly unfaithful?

    As for your musing about potential children of marriages that never were: well, a potential child might have become another St John Vianney, but then again he might have become another Josef Stalin. I think you need to find more important things to worry about.

  5. A pleasant story. However one is often told, read, or know from our own local knowledge, of the sons of clergymen who abandon any religious belief.
    Christian denominations that have married clergy do not seem to have a great number of vocations - in fact some are in serious difficulties.
    Some years ago reports were published of high rates of divorce among Anglican clergymen in England.
    My comments are not meant in this instance to support or oppose celibacy or clergy, merely to seek facts rather than well-meaning but vague statements.

  6. Just a small matter of accuracy: Pope Gregory I the Great (590-604) did not impose celibacy on the Western church. The gentleman who imposed celibacy was Gregory VII (1073-85) and, while an important pope, I'd hardly call him 'great'. Paul Collins

  7. Please spare us the diatribe on married priests.

    The hard truth is that the average Catholic parent in Australia has enough on their hands trying to get their children to practise their faith into adulthood. Imagine how tough it would be, being both a priest and parent.

    Look at the average Catholic parish in Australia each Sunday and witness that half the congregation have left before receiving the final blessing and you people seriously think that priests would come within these people's rank.

    It is a bit rich to suggest that vocations will increase if opened up to married Catholics when the average Australian Catholic does not even know the basics of the faith.

  8. Mr Collins, no pope has ever "imposed celibacy" on the Western Church or on anyone. Gregory VII merely formalised as a definitive rule for the entire Latin rite what had already been the overwhelming general rule for centuries and had been the preferred option right from the beginning.

    Also note that in the early centuries of the Church, the minority of ordination candidates who were married were generally expected to abstain from the marital act after ordination - a rule which is no longer applied.

  9. Norma,

    You talk strongly about justice, yet you do not do the church the justice of acknowledging why celibacy became an integral part of the priesthood in the first place.

    Like parenthood, the priesthood is a twenty-four-hour-a-day mission. As you say, marriage is one of the most important vocations in the world and as such, should not come into conflict with anything else. A priest who was truly doing his job tending his flock would have no choice but to sacrifice the needs of his family, and vice versa. How many marriages fall apart because the wife or husband devotes too much time to their career?

    In fact, we could argue that the call for married priests is like calling for politicians to be allowed full time second jobs. It's a bit hard to imagine Kevin Rudd being allowed to get away with it even if he wanted to!

    While there is no doubt that there are married pastors in protestant denominations doing wonderful work (often far better than many priests, I'd say), logic suggests that they cannot be available to serve all of their people all of the time. Priests, through their sacrifice of celibacy, have no such constraints and let's thank God for that!

  10. Ian just because you think that you wouldn't be able to handle being both married and a priest doesn't mean that there aren't some people who would jump at the chance to be both.

  11. Paul Collins, a bit of news: no one particularly cares whether or not you consider Pope St. Gregory VII great, least of all St. Gregory VII.

    Norma, how very good of you to express your opinion! If you don't like the Church's discipline or doctrine, you have two choices: Either, you can submit your mind to that of the Church's which is older and wiser and Divinely instituted, or if you don't believe the last point, leave.

    Neil De Cruz, there was one family where son followed father into a clerical vocation. We know them as the Borgias.

  12. Ian,read the other comments posted and they show that you are out of touch. It's time for our bishops,cardinals curia etc etc, and pope to do a reality check.
    Soon you won't need priests because
    the pews will be empty.due to the church's intransigence and inflexibilty on this issue
    bill

  13. Well Alex,

    At least I am humble enough to admit that. The vocation of marriage and priesthood are quite separate - arrogant the man that thinks he can fulfil the role while not completly surrendering oneself to Christ.

    I concentrate on being a good layman first before thinking that somehow I could do the job as a priest.

    The question remains how can all your liberal and dissenting buddies proclaim that they are worthy enough for the most sacred office when they cannot simply get a basic precept of the faith right?

    You are telling me that the average Catholic parish in Australia would contain people worthy of the priesthood. I am telling you that the average Catholic parish in Australia is generally lukewarm and full of people that need to become better laypersons first, before they arrogantly think they could fill the shoes of a priest.

    Me thinks that the Church does not need dissenters who have a full view of themselves as priests and who would be going home to their wife like the rest of humanity, but humble and celibate men who serve the Lord wholly and fully.

    If it is good enough for Christ, it is good enough for His priesthood.

  14. If Paul Collins truly loved God, He would humbly return to his role in which he was ordained instead of being an arrogant know it all that runs to the secular press at every chance to knock the Church.

    Bit hypocritical for a man to pass judgement on the Church when he himself has caused scandal and was not willing to keep on the ship.

    Paul Collins has made his choice so please now leave the rest of us Catholics trying to do the right thing alone, and leave us to love and serve Christ's Church.

  15. I suspect Paul Collins is not very fond of St Gregory VII because of his position regarding ecclesiastical appointments.

    Puts a bit of a dent in his own views concerning appointments by the laity.

  16. The fuller article in The Independent says that ' Many of those in the Anglo-Catholic wing of the Anglican Church, for instance, defected to Catholicism in protest over the ordination of women priests and some were married. They are allowed to stay within wedlock despite being priests in the Catholic Church but are expected to remain celibate.'

    Did anyone bother to consult the Anglican priests' wives about the celibacy condition? Or were they of no consequence when it comes to upholding the out- of-date discipline of compulsory celibacy?

    Is it any wonder that so many people who would otherwise be attracted to Christ see the the Church authorities as obsessed with sex?

  17. Conor, The Independent has it wrong. They are probably confusing celibacy with chastity.

    And contrary to their implication, an Anglican clergyman who converts to Catholicism is not automatically allowed to become a priest. He must offer himself as a candidate and the bishop decides whether to ordain him, just like any other candidate.

    And I can assure you that before a man is ordained to the permanent diaconate, his wife is closely consulted and her approval is required. I'm sure the same would apply a fortiori in the rare cases of married men who want to become priests.

    It is not the Church which is obsessed with sexual activity, but the media. They know that nobody will read any article about the Church unless they somehow link it with sexual actrivity.

    In my experience, the less involved someone is with the Church, the more obsessed they are about sexual activities. The official Church hardly ever mentions the subject.

  18. Actually soothsayer I think it would probably be better to point out how absurd it would be to allow our politicians to marry... Oh wait.

    Ian, you seem to be getting a lot more out of my statement than was in it. I'm not claiming that every man who feels the call to the priesthood is necessarily capable of carrying out the duties required of them, however I'm sure that there are at least a few who are. And my supposedly “liberal” and “dissenting” buddies are no more arrogant then your average single man who wishes to become a priest. There are some very smart, talented and wise married people out there.

    And I hate to tell you, but the Church doesn’t view marriage as separate to the priesthood. The very fact that married ex-Anglican ministers may become Catholic priests goes to prove this fact, not to mention the married priests of the Eastern-Rite Churches. Then again, I suppose these are all just vain, arrogant men attempting to do the job of a good ol’ celibate man.

  19. Don't worry about men becoming priests first. Worry about whether we are being evangelized and sacramentalized as Catholics. Worry about living the faith. Worry about believing in Christ and most importantly, worry about living the Gospel. If these are important to you, do what's best.

    On a side note, married Catholic men should remember that the Latin Rite will never open up its doors for married men to be ordained priests.
    They should consider switching over to the Eastern Rite of the Catholic Church. Make seeking the face of God the priority of your vocation of faith, and many things will unravel before you in your journey. God be with you.

  20. There are married priests in the Catholic Church - they are found in the Eastern Catholic churches. Seek them out, learn the spirituality, experience the ups-and-downs of community life, and consult a priest to be your spiritual father. See where that leads you. Bickering about this issue will lead us nowhere. If the priesthood is really your calling, there is always a way.

  21. Right and wrong Bill,

    Right in that very soon all lukewarm and modernist parishes and orders will have to close their doors but wrong in that those sections of the Church, Dioceses and orders that remained traditional and orthodox will keep on keeping on.

    This is already evident in Australia.

    Praise be God that he will bring an end to all outdated modernist Vatican II rubbish but extends His blessings to those that have remained faithful and true.

  22. Mr Nunis, a married Latin-rite Catholic who transferred to an Eastern-rite church for the purpose of becoming a priest would be very unlikely to be accepted for ordination. Probably he would even be told to go back to worshipping in the Latin rite.

    And in any case I think very very few married Latin-rite men would be willing to learn a new language, become thoroughly imbued in a new culture, and learn, say and perform the complex and unfamiliar words and rubrics of the Mass and sacraments in any of the Eastern-rite liturgies (much longer and more complex than even the Extraordinary Form [1962 Mass] of the Latin Rite).

    And he would have to give up many things which those Westerners who favour married priests typically also hold dear (altar girls/women, lay readers and communion ministers, communion in the hand, etc. If his wife came with him she would be expected to cover her head in church. )

  23. Soothsayer....it's nice to think that celibate priests have the luxury of being able to devote all their time to their people. In fact, logic says that not even the best celibate priest can do that. Priests are not machines..they need time off. I lived in a country town where there was 1 doctor and 3 clergy (RC, Ang, UC) .....guess who had the heaviest work-load and the most awesome reponsibilty......not the clergy. When the RC priest took his day off and headed out of town who was there to look after his flock.....the Anglican priest! On the other hand I know of celibate clergy who are so lonely in their celibacy that they are not functioning in a healthy way.

  24. And yes Norma, marriage is a sacrament and one of the most important vocations in the world, and yes, the pope and the Church are still saying and will always say what Christ taught her, which Scripture repeatedly attests (and which the Council of Trent infallibly declared true for all men for all time): that celibacy is superior to marriage.

  25. "Mr Nunis, a married Latin-rite Catholic who transferred to an Eastern-rite church for the purpose of becoming a priest would be very unlikely to be accepted for ordination. Probably he would even be told to go back to worshipping in the Latin rite."

    If indeed, a man joins an Eastern-Rite parish with the intention of becoming a priest and makes his intentions known, an Eastern priest will journey with you and see to it that he's made for it. But most importantly, he must be a parishioner first and that his goal is to please and serve God.

    "And in any case I think very very few married Latin-rite men would be willing to learn a new language, become thoroughly imbued in a new culture, and learn, say and perform the complex and unfamiliar words and rubrics of the Mass and sacraments in any of the Eastern-rite liturgies (much longer and more complex than even the Extraordinary Form [1962 Mass] of the Latin Rite)."

    This is where I must correct you. I attend a Melkite Church every Sunday and every Divine Liturgy takes a little longer than an hour - which is no different than the Latin-Rite Mass, irrespective of form. Besides, everything has been translated into plain and simple English for the benefit of transferring/convert priests and there is no requirement to learn another language to celebrate the Divine Liturgy in lands of the diaspora. I know of Melkite priests who speak no Arabic and yet, celebrate the Divine Liturgy effectively. Besides, if there is a language to be learnt, it would be Greek, just as some Latin should be known in the Latin Rite. For a fact however, in the Eastern Rite, the language of the people is the language of the liturgy. In this case, if everyone speaks English, why should the Divine Liturgy not be celebrated in English?

    "And he would have to give up many things which those Westerners who favour married priests typically also hold dear (altar girls/women, lay readers and communion ministers, communion in the hand, etc. If his wife came with him she would be expected to cover her head in church. )"

    Do not readily assume that every Catholic man who yearns for a married priesthood is a liberal as many would stereotype. There are many people who have taken the plunge and they are happier than ever. Go to an Eastern church and participate in the liturgy, and you will understand why people do what they do. Headscarves are not mandatory these days, as I know of a Divine Liturgy which is made up of Latins. They know the tradition well, but have not been mandated to wear headscarves. In the end, my first post makes sense again.

  26. Thanks for the correction re the languages Mr Nunis. Making generalisations about Eastern Catholics is almost as fraught as making generalisations about Protestants! ;-)

    I do think though that you are presenting the road to EC priesthood for a married Latin-riter as much broader and easier than it is. I do know of one such man who made enquiries about doing this and was sent off with a flea in his ear!

    I didn't "assume" that those favouring married priests must also favour the other things, nor would I ever characterise them as "liberal" nor stereotype them. Merely that typically those who favour one also favour the others.

    Nor did I claim that head coverings (be they scarves, veils, mantillas or hats) are "mandated", only that they are generally "expected". AFAIK head-coverings have never been mandated in the Latin rite either.

    Yes I have been to Eastern (not Melkite I'm afraid) liturgies and have several friends who thrive on them, including one who transferred from the Latin rite. I certainly implied no disrespect or disparagement at all to the ECCs if that is what you are suggesting.

  27. Hi Ronk, thanks for replying. ;) I hope I did not send the wrong message that joining the priesthood in the Eastern Rite for a Latin man is an easy venture. After all, no Eastern bishop will take a man if he's looking for an easy fix to join the Eastern Rite. Undeniably, there is the adjustment to a new surrounding culture (which you're expected to understand, not accept wholesale), a smaller apostolate, a new liturgy, and a new spirituality. If the priesthood is the aim, then the candidate in question has to remember that he's doing it with the intention of serving the people and liturgy of his new Rite. Of course, he can certainly be biritual, but that depends on the local ordinary. A man with a heart of mission for God will find his way and will take that way.

    I am in the Eastern Rite simply because I feel that the West needs to know about them and start regarding them as equal Catholics and because there are hearts hungry for God.

  28. Okay, I have to ask - what's wrong with altar girls/women?

  29. (Alex) "what's wrong with altar girls/women?"
    Nothing, in my humble opinion. But save it for another time please. One controversial issue per thread is enough.

  30. Is it immoral or sinful to be sacramentally married in the Roman Catholic Church? This question might sound stupid as a Catholic. This childlike question leads me to ask; if marriage is good, why then does marriage become an impediment for young men who honestly desire or in fact called to serve as priests in the Roman catholic and are also called to be married? Why should marriage - which is a good act - become a forbidden act for priests? Why should marriage (a holy act) disqualify married Catholics from becoming priests? This doesn't make sense to me. I am sorry to say that despite their levels of academic exposures, many Catholic leaders are still blind. I carefully red the bible and neither Christ nor his disciples forbade marriage even though catholic leaders are building theological walls around their support for celibacy. It is shocking that leaders of the Catholic Church who claim to be advocate of fundamental human right actually deny their priests their fundamental right to make free decisions to married or not to marry. Do you honestly think that celibacy should be enforced? How would you feel if you got terminated from your job because you got married?

  31. This, in spite of the inherent paradox lying just below the claim that the gift of celibacy is a precious gift of God to the priesthood and the church: How can a gift be legislated. Celibacy really isn't the issue -- mandatory or obligatory celibacy is.
    There are many priests who do possess the gift of celibacy -- it is their "truth" so to speak -- and their humanity, warmth and pastoral effectiveness give abundant evidence of their authentic celibate lives. But there remain other priests who believe deep down they are called to the priesthood but not to celibacy. And for these men, the burden of mandated celibacy threatens their spiritual and emotional well-being. The priesthood may be their "truth," but mandated celibacy wraps them in a cloak of loneliness and struggle.
    I wonder if church officials understand the burden they place on the shoulders of a man who believes he is called to priestly ministry but not to celibacy. Certainly, a married priesthood will have burdens of its own and, sadly, scandals of its own -- infidelity and abuse among others. But it should be left to the individual priest and seminarian to determine whether or not he is blessed with the gift of celibacy.
    A mandated "gift," after all, is really no gift at all.

Delicious

More from this section

  1. DNA may reveal origins of medieval monks' manuscripts

    A British scientist has discovered that it is possible to extract DNA samples from medieval parchment which may make it possible to identify the origins of ancient manuscripts including bibles and prayer books.

  2. Maltese lecturer "excommunicates" himself

    Maltese university lecturer, Dr Patrick Attard, who contested the last general election as the first openly gay candidate, has officially "excommunicated" himself from the Catholic Church.

  3. Catholic couple refuse to abort siamese twins

    A British Catholic woman, who is pregnant with rare dicephalous twins, and her husband have refused to contemplate an abortion despite medical advice to do so.

  4. Vietnamese Catholics to appeal convictions

    Eight Vietnamese Catholics who were convicted recently over protests concerning the demolition and confiscation of Church property are appealing their cases to the Hanoi Appellate Court.

  5. Israeli airstrike destroys Caritas clinic

    An Israeli airstrike has destroyed a clinic operated by Caritas Jerusalem, reports say.

Church Resources provides a range of services for the Church and not-for-profit sector, including aggregating buying power for a wide range of products and services used by health, welfare, aged care, education and parish organisations. More »

Subscribe

Receive CathNews headlines in your inbox daily.

News Feed

Subscribe to the CathNews RSS feed to get the daily edition automatically delivered to you.

Daily Prayer

Gospel Verse for 31 July 2010
...though [Herod] wanted to put [John] to death, he feared the people, because they held him to be a prophet. [Matthew 14:5]

View Podcast