Make Text Larger Make Text Smaller Email this Article to a Friend Print this Article

Items "removed" from St Mary's: Minutes

Published: May 11, 2009

Minutes from a meeting of Brisbane's Central Deanery list a series of items including a candleholder, timber table and vestments that were "removed" from South Brisbane's St Mary's church but former administrator Fr Peter Kennedy denies any wrongdoing.

Fr Kennedy said they belonged either to him personally or the church community and not the Brisbane Catholic Archdiocese, The Courier-Mail reports.

Fr Kennedy said 20 years ago he had contributed $4,500 towards the cost of the piano, which is now located in the Trades and Labour Council building where the breakaway St Mary's community has worshipped since Fr Kennedy finished up on April 19.

"The community also raised some money through holding concerts," Fr Kennedy said.

"The table was made by myself and a carpenter from timber from the Natural Arch area. I also had the Paschal Candle holder made and a faithful member of our congregation, Gordon Smith, now deceased, paid for it."

"The implication, of course, is that we have stolen these things and this is simply not true," he said.

Attendances at the St Mary's-in-Exile services remain high.

Around 300 people attended Sunday morning's Mass at the TLC building, compared to around 40 at St Mary's, which is now under the administration of St Stephen's Cathedral dean, Fr Ken Howell.

Fr Howell said he had written to Fr Kennedy before he'd taken over the parish asking for an inventory, but hadn't received a reply.

"Until I'm across all the facts, I'll just have to wait and see," he told The Courier-Mail.

SOURCE

Sacked St Mary's priest Peter Kennedy takes what's his (Courier-Mail)

ARCHIVE

St Mary's march out

 

 

Response to articles is welcome. Simply follow the prompts to post your comment. No posting of more than 250 words will be published. While critical comment on stories and issues is welcomed, postings that descend to personal attacks on or impugn the integrity of other commentators will be blocked. Please use your own name, or initials, eg John Brown, or JB, or JAB, or Johnny. You are also required to add your location to the end of your email - as in, Sunshine, Victoria. Please provide your email address in the line supplied, followed by your contact phone number. These are requested for identification purposes only and will not be published. If you have any problems, please email news@cathnews.com

Recent Comments

  1. Perhaps the best approach with this troubled priest is to ignore him and give him no more publicity?

  2. Is CathNews so devoid of issue of real merit and concern to talk about that they have to resort to this?
    Anyone who has been part of the St Mary's community for a length of time knows that the table was previously located at Peter's place at Numinbah Valley and had been made from a tree which had fallen on the property.
    As for vestments, the only vestments Peter had ever worn in the 18yrs I had been part of St Mary's was a white alb. I would think that in his work at the prison and with the navy, Peter would not have had use of or worn vestments as were in use in other parishes, so it is not surprising that there were no vestments there.

  3. This situation is extremly sad - now there is debate over the parish inventory. So much hurt and upset all because Fr. Kennedy gave his people responsibilities and tasks beyond what is possible in the Catholic Church. As a church we urgently need to pray for his now broken community and their Archishop as they seek for a way to journey forward.

  4. Why are the neo-cons so vicious,to the extent of even bearing false witness against Fr Peter Kennedy and the St Mary's Catholic Community in-exile; that is just not on, that sort of horrible behaviour of power and control.

  5. First of all we need to be clear and point out that apparently the Archdiocese did not notice the discrepancies until the Courier Mail went digging around (according to their article). Fr Howell said he is going to investigate the claims. I bring this up just so we don't get people saying things like "The Archdiocese is just trying to smear Fr Kennedy!"

    To quote the article: "Asked whether action would be taken to recover the items, Father Howell said the first he'd heard of their whereabouts was from The Courier-Mail."

    To be honest, I think the biggest concern here is the $4500+ piano. If Fr Kennedy purchased the piano for his own use, but lent it to the Church then it is understandable that he took it with him. However, if the parish community raised the money and bought the piano for the PARISH, then surely it belongs to the parish, and not this vague concept of the "community." After all, Church communities change all the time, but the "Parish" remains constant. On top of this, I'm assuming people who donated the money for the piano to be used did so under the assumption that the piano would be used for the parish! Priests, like people within communities, come and go. I think it would be a betrayal of these people's trust for a priest to simply take a piano with him because he feels that he has the right to.

  6. Surely the late Mr Smith thought that he was donating the candlestick to the parish, not to an individual priest? What on earth would PK do with a huge candlestick? And why does a man who daily boasts in the media that he is the world’s greatest friend to the poor, have a country estate in such an exclusive resort location anyway?

    Every parish I know of has a substantial stock of vestments which belong to the parish, not to any priest. If PK never wore them, they should be in excellent condition.

    Incredible that some hard-core denialists still manage to stick their heads in the sand and pretend that PK’s troubles stem merely because he supposedly “gave his people responsibilities and tasks”. Richard, the man has denied Christ, and unlike his great patron (whose papacy he rejects) he has steadfastly persisted in his denial despite every entreaty to return and acknowledge Him as Lord.

    Gerald, what is the nature of this supposed “false witness” which you claim these supposed “neo-cons” have borne against PK and his denomination? And who are they? and how do you claim to know that they are neo-cons?

  7. Talk about gongs clashing .... How petty, stupid, and wrong, suggesting PK is a thief. Denials that wasn’t the intention will highlight how far the Cathedral has lost its moral compass. Since when do minutes of deanery meetings become press releases for the CM? If this was dreamt up by the Cathedral’s hired PR firm, they should give our money back.

    What wasn't taken from St Mary's were the framed aboriginal treaty documents, left against the front of the altar, but now shifted out of plain sight to the side. How long before they miraculously disappear? ATM, even in the imprimatured St Mary’s mass, lip service is paid to the original inhabitants, though somewhat unenthusiastically.

    How ironic that the exiles are informed that Adelaide’s Archbishop Wilson now apologises for the wrongful excommunication of Mary MacKillop in 1871, and that MMcK was a St Mary’s parishioner back then, and in the imprimatured St Mary’s it’s decreed MMcK is official parish patroness. No mention of any apologies, how back then Bishop Shiel, pandering to parish politics it seems, got it wrong, could only bring himself to admit it on his deathbed. Not that I’m suggesting PK is cut from the same cloth as MMcK, or Bathersby, Shiel, no.
    This business of parish business surely should be a matter for parish council, and remain in camera. That’s assuming there is a genuine St Mary’s parish, in the ordinary, local district, sense, so there can even be a parish council.

  8. Agnes, Bl Mary MacKillop could not possibly have been "a St Mary's parishioner" in 1871, as the parish did not exist until 1893. And it is well known she was in Adelaide at the time; she was not "excommunicated" in absentia.

    The patroness of St Mary's is Our Lady, the Blessed Virgin Mary, whom PK so gratuitously vilifies.

    If Abp Bathersby or any of his successors ever apologises over the PK matter, it will be an apology for allowing the infection to fester for so long until it became a boil that had to be lanced.

    The rest of your mistakes had been kindly anticipated and pre-corrected by Alex.

  9. My goodness, I am speechless after knowing what's going on with Fr Kennedy? We really have to pray hard and do some sacrifices and penance for the best solution of this problem. It seems to me it's getting too complicated. May God touch the hearts of those involved.

  10. Also Agnes, it is contrary to Church Law to have any profane object not required for the celebration of the Mass, left leaning against the altar. As the supposed “treaty” has no legal standing whatsoever, what happens to it is of no consequence. Apparently even PK and his new mini-denomination didn’t regard it as important enough to take with them.

    And the purpose of a Parish Council is merely to advise the Parish Priest. It is not based on or representative of any “local district” as you assert. It consists of people whom the Parish Priest chooses to advise him, after, if he so wishes, receiving the advice of members of the parish as to whom he should choose. What he does with that advice, or the Parish Council’s advice, is up to him. The Catholic Church is not, never has been, and never possibly can be a democracy.

  11. Dear Ronk,
    don't be afraid to say that the Catholic Church never will be a democracy. As long as Jesus Christ, Only Son of the Living God is Head of His Church, His Mystical Body, then that Body will always be ruled by the Head and not feet or any other part.
    The Church is hierarchical and the hierarchy is of Divine institution.

  12. Becket, I'm not afraid to say so. Sorry I confused you with my multiple negatives.

  13. How does 'Wronk again" know the mind of the late Mr Smith? Did he know him as well as Fr Kennedy did?

    One can expect the perennial Wronk to take every opportunity to denigrate and misrepresent Fr Kennedy and those who defend him.

    But should anyone else ever voice even the slightest criticism of Holy Mother Church, Roman Wronk goes all thin-skinned, high-dungeoned and defensive.

Bookmark and Share

More from this section

  1. Quinlan warns on "untargetted" home grant

    CSSA executive director, Frank Quinlan, has warned that an "untargetted" boost to the First Home Buyers Grant may unleash market forces that make home ownership more difficult for working Australians.

  2. Good Friday footy: Melbourne bishops protest

    Melbourne Catholic Archbishop Denis Hart and Anglican Bishop Philip Huggins, who is Vicar-General of the city's Anglican archdiocese, have rejected any proposal to play AFL games on Good Friday.

  3. Filmmaker's Virgin Mary outrage

    Filmmaker Justin Sisely has launched an advertising poster campaign in Sydney featuring an image of the Virgin Mary with male genitalia on her forehead.

  4. Most ordinations for Sydney in 20 years

    Cardinal George Pell has ordained four new priests for Sydney, the highest number of ordinations on one day since 1988.

  5. Homeless camp outside Fraser Coast churches

    Rising numbers of homeless men are sleeping in church courtyards on Queensland's Fraser Coast

Church Resources provides a range of services for the Church and not-for-profit sector, including aggregating buying power for a wide range of products and services used by health, welfare, aged care, education and parish organisations. More »

Subscribe

Receive CathNews headlines in your inbox daily.

News Feed

Subscribe to the CathNews RSS feed to get the daily edition automatically delivered to you.

Daily Prayer

Gospel Verse for 6 September 2010
"...is it lawful on the Sabbath...to save life or to destroy it?" [Luke 6:9]

View Podcast