Make Text Larger Make Text Smaller Email this Article to a Friend Print this Article

Vatican confirms it will examine "soundness of doctrine" of US women religious

Published: August 05, 2009

Vatican appointed apostolic visitator to US women religious congragations Mother Mary Clare Millea has sent major superiors letters that indicates the effort will involve an examination of "the soundness of doctrine held and taught" by the women.

When the study was first announced it was explained that it was intended to examine "the quality of life" of US women religious, with an eye to finding out why vocations have dropped over the years, according to the National Catholic Reporter.

Initially, some women religious expressed confusion and scepticism concerning the purpose of the investigation and questioned its intent.

Mother Millea, superior general of the Apostles of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the apostolic visitator charged by the Vatican with directing the study, sent a letter dated July 28 to the heads of women religious congregations, along with an Instrumentum Laboris, or "working paper".

The paper outlined the next phases of the investigation, including the thrust of a questionnaire that the religious heads are to fill out and return to Millea.

The paper also explained in greater detail the focus of the apostolic visitation, the news report added.

The first phase of the investigation that included interviews with the religious superiors concluded July 31. The next phase involves the heads of the orders to filling out and returning questionnaires relating to the life and operation of the orders. Phase three involves visitations to selected congregations.

The areas of concern identified in the questionnaire include identity; governance; vocation promotion; admission and formation policies; spiritual life and common life; mission and ministry; and finances.

The Instumentum Laboris states: "The Apostolic Visitation will focus on the fundamentals of the religious vocation, including consecration by profession of the evangelical counsels through public vow within a particular religious institute wherein members exercise some external apostolic work(s). Particular attention will be given to the significant witness of the vowed commitment given by women religious within the heritage of each institute's charism and in fidelity to the Church's teachings and to the renewal indicated by Vatican Council II and post-conciliar documents. It will examine, for example, promotion and retention of vocations; initial and ongoing formation; the concrete living out of the evangelical counsels; common life and religious houses; the structures and practical application of internal governance; the soundness of doctrine held and taught by the religious; the nature and variety of apostolic works; and the overall administration of temporal goods."

FULL STORY @

Women religious study to include 'soundness of doctrine' (National Catholic Reporter)

Working paper outlines information being sought from religious orders (Catholic News Service)

LINKS

Mother Mary Clare Millea's letter to the women religious congregation heads.

Full text of the Instumentum Laboris and appendices

 

Response to articles is welcome. Simply follow the prompts to post your comment. No posting of more than 250 words will be published. While critical comment on stories and issues is welcomed, postings that descend to personal attacks on or impugn the integrity of other commentators will be blocked. Please use your own name, or initials, eg John Brown, or JB, or JAB, or Johnny. You are also required to add your location - as in, Sunshine, Victoria. Please provide your email address in the line supplied, followed by your contact phone number. These are requested for identification purposes only and will not be published. If you have any problems, please email news@cathnews.com


 


Recent Comments

  1. The reason for no vocations is blatantly obvious. Most "Nuns" dress, act and live pretty much as Lay People; Hair styles, makeup and jewellery! Plus their catechetical teaching is often woefully non-catholic. Why would a girl be even interested in joining, as they can have the same kind of life 'in the world'? It is very true that "Clothes maketh the person" like it or not.
    Same goes for Clergy in lay people's business suit and tie, not to mention cut-offs & T-shirt.
    Religious Habits can indeed be modified, but tossing them aside altogether has been a huge mistake. Roman Collar for Clergy & a long skirt & modified Veil for Nuns. "Traditionally" dressed Religious have no shortage of vocations.

  2. Why are women religious being asked why there's been a drop in vocations?? Why aren't people in the secular society being asked why God has become nothing to them - too much effort to put God first? Too many rules so I can't do it "my way"? Why is the focus on the "quality of life" of religious orders?? Why is it assumed that something is wrong with religious life rather than the secular society in which we live?? The whole study needs to be rethought!

  3. It's terrible! The company I work for is the same. Can you believe they actually do audits on our financials, and make us do "training sessions" on Standards of Business Conduct??

  4. I suppose there are two ways to deal with these dissident religious orders.

    One is to ignore them, in which case they would have disappeared in another ten years. Problem solved.

    The other (and more difficult) choice is to try and steer them back to their original path in the hope of restoring their vitality and making them attractive to young women contemplating the religious life.

    It looks as though the Vatican has opted for the second solution. I hope it works.

  5. Amazing(!) .... to think there are actually lay Catholics out there (who themselves don't wear any form of habit or 'dog collar') but who really think vocations continue on the slide because some of those who opt for the 'religious life' don't also wear the silly costumes? That's only slightly illogical ...
    Vocations in Western countries will continue to diminish so long as the Church remains detached from actual life here on planet earth whilst persisting in its efforts to 'bury' clerical sex abuse.
    I will wager that the Church will take fully one-hundred years to recover from the blight of child abuse, and then only if real steps are taken to eradicate it now.

  6. Does anyone commenting on habits realise that details of what Sisters are expected to wear are approved by the Vatican when Congregational Chapters submit their deliberations?

  7. Good one Greg,

    In twenty years' time when the only vocations left are from the traditional side of the Church and priests have returned to their clerical dress, your comments will be remembered.

    Lord, bring us traditional and orthodox priests.

  8. It matters not to me what members of religious orders wear.
    Medieval dress anyone ?
    Of far greater significance and impact is the nature of their apostolic service which gives daily witness of a deep commitment to service of community ,to faith development and active engagement in the world.

  9. Greg, clerical sex abuse and the decay of religious communities are both part of the same problem, together with lax attitudes amongst the laity.

    That problem is the invasion of the Church by secular thinking. So there's a battle between the Church and the secular world, and at the moment the secular world seems to be winning.

    Meantime, however, a third force, in the form of Islam, has entered the fray, and this could make things very complicated.

  10. Is it possible to know what role the American Bishops( especially the Metropolitan Archbishops and the local Ordinaries) have played in this Vatican investigation?

  11. Can someone explain to me, when priests/religious were dressed in the collar/habit etc, that was when abuse was at its height??

  12. Did Jesus dress differently to those men around him? Did Mary dress differently to those women around her? Did the Apostles? When did special "clerical" gear come in? I wonder what Jesus really thinks about it?

    When is someone going to investigate the Vatican re :"soundness of doctrine". We have an absolutist monarchical papacy straight out of the medieval era; we have a bunch of curial sissies who prance around all day in their dresses and are so remote from reality. At least Jesus and the apostles lived in reality and didn't flee it!

    Do we need all these religious orders? Jesus did warn us that the Church needs to be pruned heavily (yearly?). Are we being pruned of what is not, ultimately, essential? Now, let's prune the Vatican.

  13. Dear David Anthony Davies, where do you get that statistic? I have the opposite impression, that sexual abuse by clergy seems to go hand in hand with their discarding clerical dress.

    Dear Greg, there have been very few allegations of sexual abuse among nuns, and none have been proved as far as I'm aware. This could hardly be the explanation for the huge drop in vocations of most of the major orders of nuns in the USA.

    Dear Greg, the absolute monarchical papacy is actually straight out of the Apostolic era. Christ ordered it that way, just as He ordered St Peter and his successors to make regulations for His Church, including the authority to prescribe what dress His priests should wear.

  14. Francis, if there were no Vatican, there'd be no Church. We'd all have to make our own little non-churches.

  15. Well said Francis ... but I'll not be holding my breath waiting for the 'authorities' in the men's club to do anything positive. In fact, we had a wonderful rebirth experience in the Church in the 1960s as you'll recall but the authorities have been hard at work endeavouring to wind it all back and drive the Spirit back out again.
    As to the silly medieval dress/habits, it's a telling fact that perhaps the most affected by the drastic decline in religious vocations seem to be those orders which so doggedly cling to the 'cloth', e.g. Benedictines, Cistercians, Franciscans etc. Seems to me, that's a telling phenomenon.

  16. Peter G....where did you get the nonsense that the absolutist monarchical papacy is straight out of the apostolic era and that this is the way Christ ordered it? The early Church knew of no such monstrosity. Where did Peter rule as absolute monarch? Where did Peter make any absolute ruling? The apostolic church functioned much more collegially and democratically. In fact James, the Lord's brother, seems to have made the most significant ruling at the Council of Jerusalem (Acts 15). There was no monarchical bishop of Rome until the second century. The evidence is that the Church in Rome was governed by a college of presbyters, Clement being the secretary.

    Lance, you do the Holy Spirit a gross injustice. Anyway, there was no vatican in the early Church for quite a while and yet the Church still functioned and flourished. The Church is not the Vatican - the Church is the baptised gathered to hear the Word of God and celebrate Eucharist. The Church exists whether or not the vatican does.

  17. Dear Francis and Greg,

    Thank God you said something, I do believe there is God still, unfortunately we women of the church can only be empowered if sensible men with young hearts and minds would speak out, a lot of the hopeless 'old' men (and I am not talking about age) are hopeless, we need to wait for them to die off.

    Your sister in Christ,

    J

  18. Well said Francis. It appears to me that the more the so called traditional view that is held, the less knowledge of truth and history is also in evidence.As such it is NOT the true traditional reality, try convincing some people of the fact though !

  19. Francis said "The Church is not the Vatican - the Church is the baptised gathered to hear the Word of God and celebrate Eucharist. The Church exists whether or not the vatican does." Wrong.
    The Church is ALL baptised people INCLUDING the PRIESTS, BISHOPS IN COMMUNION WITH THE POPE. The laity are NOT the Catholic Church and cannot exist alone without unity with the POPE and BISHOPS otherwise they are another PROTESTING (PROTESTANT) Church. If you think you are in union with Christ without unity with the POPE and Bishops , you are not. What does HOLY COMMUNION mean but being IN UNION with all the teachings of the Church AND that includes union with the POPE and the Bishops because they are part of the Catholic Church. If you love Christ you will LOVE HIS Church and that includes the BISHOPS in UNION with the POPE. Therefore, if you despise the POPE you despise Christ Himself who gave Peter the authority (NOT AUTHORITARIAN) to be the leader amongst the first Twelve Apostles (the First Priests) when Christ said "YOU are Peter and upon this ROCK I will build MY Church".

  20. Dear Francis,

    It may make you feel good to imagine that the early Church was a democracy. But you can’t simply project your feelings onto history and rewrite it to try to reduce St Peter and his successors to merely jotting down the minutes of democratic committee meetings! The record of history shows that Christ ordained St Peter and his successors as supreme priest, prophet AND spiritual KING of His people of earth.

    Democracy is one of the Church’s finest gifts to the secular world, but democracy is not an absolute value. It is not necessary for all states and institutions to be democratic. The Church has never been a democracy. Nor could we ever make it into one. Christ made His Church hierarchical on Earth, just as it is in Heaven with God ruling over the orders and ranks of angels and saints.

    Do yourself a favour and read Acts chapter 15 with an open mind, without trying to inject into it your pre-conceived weirdly anachronistic “everybody has equal democratic authority” idea into this historical record. Let God’s inerrant Word speak to you, rather than trying to tell God what His Word means.

    You see that after both sides of the question at hand were presented, St Peter issued his infallible ruling, after which there was no more discussion of the pros and cons of the question. St Peter then delegated to St James merely the job of enunciating a sensitive pastoral plan to put into practice the principle which St Peter had just infallibly proclaimed. There is no historical record of any of the Apostles ever dissenting from any of the universal doctrines proclaimed by St Peter.

    "There was no Vatican" in the sense that the popes did not live at the Vatican Hill until a few hundred years ago, but there most certainly was a "Vatican" in the sense of the office of the supreme pastor of the Church on earth.

  21. R....wakey, wakey! You are saying exactly what I said so what's your beef! Of course the "church" is all the baptised - that's exactly what I said (I presume priest and bishops are baptised so, therefor, they are church with the rest of the baptised). Of course, the laity are the church. In many parts of the world, and at different times through history, where there have been no bishops and priests available the people of God have still gathered for prayer, Scripture, and Holy Communion. The Church has gathered even if there has been no priest. There are many Catholic communities in Australia that meet each Sunday without a priest and they have a Liturgy of the Word with Holy Communion - are you saying that they are not Church? What a dreadful put-down!

    Your emotional rantings and sermonising seems to suggest that I don't love Jesus, Church (People of God) of the bishops. You judge that I don't love the pope. There are many over-exaggerated things about the practice of the papacy that I don't love for sure and there are some popes throughout history who have committed apostasy, heresy, murder, and gross immorality (John XII eg) that I would find difficult to love, that's for sure.What an irrational response. You seem to suggest that unless one thinks as you do (very clericalised and limiting of the Holy Spirit) then they do not love Jesus, the People of God etc. What Pharisaical judgementalism!

  22. Peter G, what nonsense! The bishop of Rome as supreme priest, prophet and KING wow!! I didn't know that we Catholics had to believe that because I don't. Where are they to be found in the Catechism? Where do they fit into the hierarchy of truths? Does my salvation depend on my believing that the bishop of Rome is all these things? l thought Jesus was very critical of his followers taking such exaggerated accolades for themselves. Jesus didn't seem to be very impressed with "kings" and those who wear gorgeous, elaborate robes, and loved the best seats, and called themselves "(Most) Holy Father" (even more than what God the Father gets). As for being a prophet.....well we've had some looney popes make all sorts of ridiculous and evil statements over the past 2000 years.....there are such as "false prophets".Are we to accept everything a pope has ever said as being "the word of the Lord" and, therefore, prophetic?

  23. PeterG....Have you never heard of the "sensus fidelium" or of "consensus fidelium". The great Catholic, soon to be declared a saint, John Henry Newman, wrote "I am accustomed to lay stress on the consensus fidelium" A terrible mistake is made, contends Newman, when decisions regarding teaching, even dogmas, are made without consulting the sense of the faithful (sensus fidelium) or the agreement of the faithful (consensus fidelium)"quoted from "As It Was In The Beginning...the Coming Democratization of the Catholic Church" by Robert McClory. Surely that is a very democrartic principle.

    We see how the early church worked along the lines of democratic principles:
    Re the replacment of Judas with another....Read Acts 1:15f....NB Peter doesn't choose Matthias - he speaks to the church gathered (about 120....incl women).

    Re Acts 15....in order to resolve a major crisis in the church the Apostles and elders gather. Peter, Paul, Barnabas and James, the Lord's brother speak:James concludes: "Therefore MY judgment is....". NB it's James' judgement, not Peter's. Your assertion that James was only delivering Peter's infallible judgement is really loopy. Where does it says that it was Peter's judgement when Luke clearly says it was James' judgement. You argue more from wishful thinking than from a reasoned exegesis of the text. I don't think you've read the text - are you from the old days when Catholics were discouraged from reading and studying the Scriptures? You see Peter was not some "infallible" pope.

    Read Acts 6 where the apostles entrust the task of selecting "deacons" to the "body of the disciples". Peter doesn't make the choice. In fact, in the whole of the NT Peter doesn't make a decision or ruling at all.
    Then there's Galatians 2:11 where Paul "opposeed Peter to his face, because he (Cephas/Peter stood condemned".

  24. Dear Francis
    I am very sad that you didn’t take my advice to look at the Scriptures with an open mind. It was kindly meant. Instead you try to force the Scriptures into the straightjacket of your un-Scriptural errors, and make a slew of silly claims about St Peter and his successors which are unsupported by the historical record. Frankly I don’t give a toss about the views on the subject of Robert McCory, whoever he may be. I receive the truth from Christ through the Church that he founded headed by the Pope whom He appointed and the Scriptures which His Church wrote and the pope authorised to be used. I will pray for you.

    PS “fidelium” means “of those who are faithful” (to Christ and His Church headed by the pope and his infallible teaching). It has nothing to do with having a democratic vote of everyone who comes up with his own wacky new doctrine. It seems you know as little about Newman’s theology as you do about Scripture and about Church history.

    I suppose your question where are these doctrines to be found in the Catechism, is merely an empty rhetorical device, but in case you are seriously interested in searching for the truth, I suggest you look in the index under “supreme pontiff”. It’s contradictory to talk about “we Catholics” and simultaneously reject several essential doctrines of the Catholic faith.

  25. Peter G,

    You didn't answer one point that I raised......are you not game to? Or do you know that you cannot?
    Who is the one not looking at the Scriptures with an open mind? I don't think you're looking at the Scriptures at all!
    The trouble is you seem to be living in the fantasy land of your own wishful thinking. Admittedly, you're probably very comfortable there so Scripture and Church History come as a threat to your comfort zone.

    Where do you find that Peter was described in the NT as "supreme priest, prophet and KING of his people"? Please teach us by providiing evidence.

    Where is the Pope ever referred to by these titles? (Supreme Pontiff is a different matter.....and I wouldn't push that too far because it's a later addition to the Faith) and not at all essential.

    So, sorry to disturb your comfort zone.

Bookmark and Share

More from this section

  1. Swiss villagers want to reverse vows regarding glacier

    Swiss Catholic villagers who have for centuries offered a sacred vow to God against the advancing ice mass of the Great Aletsch glacier now want to alter their vows.

  2. Solar statue for Padre Pio

    Italian saint, the stigmatic Padre Pio, is to get a new 200 ft (60.9 metre) high solar energy producing statue.

  3. Researcher rejects suicide link to social networking

    University of Queensland researcher Dr Keith Harris disputed a warning against social networking by the Archbishop of Westminster, saying the internet doesn't necessarily push people to suicide, but a news outlet is supporting the Archbishop.

  4. Turkey refuses Pope's Tarsus request

    Turkey's government has refused a personal request from Pope Benedict and from other Christian leaders for the reopening of the only church in Tarsus, the city of St Paul's birth.

  5. Bruno brands Palestinian Christian as "terrorist"

    Palestinian Christian activist, Ayman Abu Aita, says he will sue British comedian Sacha Baron Cohen for defamation for describing him as a "terrorist group leader" and using footage of him in the movie Bruno.

Church Resources provides a range of services for the Church and not-for-profit sector, including aggregating buying power for a wide range of products and services used by health, welfare, aged care, education and parish organisations. More »

Mass streamed live daily

From Our Lady of the Rosary Cathedral, Waitara, in the Broken Bay Diocese.
Weekdays live at 9.30am
Saturdays live 9.30am (followed by Adoration and Benediction)
Sundays live 9.30am
Click on this link at the appropriate time to connect.

Subscribe

To receive headlines from our faith-based news services, please subscribe below.

Email address

Newsletter


 

News Feed

Subscribe to the CathNews RSS feed to get the daily edition automatically delivered to you.
Subscribe to Faith Project RSS.