Have Your Say 

Recent Comments

1. Crikey! I agree with her. I had better lie down.
   However, a critical distinction must be made when bigots deliberately mis-use the freedom of speech not to advance the Truth but to spread hate and intolerance or to falsify the evidence.

   Posted By: Chris Saidou

2. The enemy of my enemy is my friend it seems.
   But then once her boss, Obama, has finished Orwell-ianising religion, I guess she won't have to worry about those Christians and others who dare to question the abortion industry facilitated by the Democratic party.

   Posted By: Peter

3. "But an individual's ability to practice his or her religion has no bearing on others' freedom of speech," Clinton said.
   Hillary Clinton sadly makes the same mistake as many others are making in this matter.
   Hillary's error is in wanting to use protection of Freedom of Speech laws to give legitimacy to collective (individuals acting commonly en masse) defamation of religion, religious practices etc.
   In such cases, defamation of religion is no longer an individual expressing - however strongly, the divergence between people, but a populist/xenophobic attack on religion itself.
   When Freedom of Speech was recognised as a human right, it was done so in the context where religious beliefs were upheld with the same such right.
   What will happen if we allow such Freedom of Speech laws to effectively destroy freedom of religion and religious practice? Where will protection for freedom of speech be then? What else will we allow a misuse of it to destroy?
   The highest German Court has begun using religious defamation Laws, sensibly, I believe, firstly against PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in their appropriation of photos of NAZI Concentration Camp Jewish inmates for a spurious campaign against meat-eaters and now, secondly, against Bishop whats-his-name who denied the Holocaust.
   Appropriate use I feel, of anti-religious defamation principles.
   I would like the money for a test case here in Australia against the author, Kaz Cooke, for her book, "Girl Stuff." The book is promoted as a full-on, spare no details or information, for girls in the teen-age years. However, going past what this article here could be termed as, the Hillaryesque critique of anti-religious defamation principles, the book 'does a complete job' on religion in order to promote non-religion.
   The only trouble is, Australia, like the USA, has no protection for religion and religious thought, it is only assumed that no one would want to defame.
   
   

   Posted By: Fr Mick Mac Andrew Bombala-Delegate NSW

• » Advertise in CathNews

Email to Friend Please fill out the following details (fields marked with a * are mandatory):
Send To Email Address*:
Send To Name *:
Sent By Email Address*:
Sent By Name *:
Text to include in email:
Captcha validation:	please enter the code above:

^ Page Top

Comment on this article

More from this section

1. Rejected asylum seekers return

   Nine Afghans, who were returned home by the Howard Government with promises and compensation, have come back and were granted protection by the Rudd Government, The Australian reports.

2. Sinnott negotiations begin

   A spokesman of the Philippines Pagadian Diocese crisis committee handling the kidnapping of Columban Fr Michael Sinnott says negotiations for the priest's release are about to begin.

3. Pope urges stronger religious freedom in Iran

   Pope Benedict urged Iran to strengthen religious freedom for the country's tiny Catholic minority, while praising the "deep religious sensibility" of the Iranian people, in a meeting with Iran's new ambassador to the Vatican.

4. New ban on US nativity display challenged

   A 63 year old tradition of a privately maintained nativity scene on a public median strip in Warren, Michigan ended following assertions that it violated the principle "of separation of church and state", but the ban is now being challenged as discriminatory.

5. Williamson fined over Holocaust remarks

   A German court has fined British SSPX Bishop Richard Williamson €12,000 (around $AUD19,000) after he was found guilty of denying the Holocaust.