Make Text Larger Make Text Smaller Email this Article to a Friend Print this Article

Row over Italy's crucifixes in classrooms

Published: November 04, 2009

A ruling by the European Court of Human Rights, which upheld the protest of an Italian woman against the display of a crucifix at a state school attended by her two children, is being criticised in Italy.

Soile Lautsi, from Abano Terme, near Padua, had taken the issue to Strasbourg on the grounds that displaying crucifixes in classrooms contradicted the separation of Church and state in Italy, said UK's Times Online.

She was awarded €5,000 in damages, with the court finding that the school had violated religious and educational freedoms guaranteed under the European Rights Convention.

It did not order the Italian authorities to remove the cross. Italian Minister for Education, Mariastella Gelmini, was scathing of the court's ruling, saying the crucifix was more a part of the country's identity than a religious symbol.

"No one, and certainly not an ideological European court, will succeed in erasing our identity," she was quoted as saying in an AFP report in the Sydney Morning Herald.

The AFP report said Lautsi's efforts to change the tradition through Italian courts had been thrown out after years of wrangling. The courts there had ruled that the crucifix was a symbol of Italy's history and culture, and therefore a part of its identity.

The Times report said that The Vatican would study the ruling before making a comment.

The ruling could reportedly encourage a review of the use of religious symbols in state schools throughout Europe, it added.

FULL STORY

Italy challenges ruling that crucifix in class violates religious freedom (Times Online)

Italy's crucifixes in classrooms 'violate rights' (Sydney Morning Herald/AFP)

 

Response to articles is welcome. Simply follow the prompts to post your comment. No posting of more than 250 words will be published. While critical comment on stories and issues is welcomed, postings that descend to personal attacks on or impugn the integrity of other commentators will be blocked. Please use your own name, or initials, eg John Brown, or JB, or JAB, or Johnny. You are also required to add your location to the end of your email - as in, Sunshine, Victoria. Please provide your email address in the line supplied, followed by your contact phone number. These are requested for identification purposes only and will not be published. If you have any problems, please email news@cathnews.com

Recent Comments

  1. How sad when the crucifix can be said to have no meaning but be adopted as a symbol of a country; especially when that country is Italy. No wonder Berlusconi has free rein.

  2. I think this ruling should be celebrated. It is great. It might mean the end of the horridly oppressive European government. It would be particularly good for the tiny nation states if "Europe" remains an economic, rather than a cultural, identity.

  3. When I see such results I have to wonder what happened to democracy. Surely Democracy is about doing what a majority want. When a court rules in favour of one person or even a small group against the wishes of the whole it is an attack on democracy.
    I see a Charter of Human Rights doing exactly this kind of thing.

  4. "It was in 1924 that Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini brought in the law which ordered that crucifixes must be displayed in school classrooms and Alessandra Mussolini, the 46-year-old granddaughter of the man who used the title II Duce, is one politician angry at the ruling of the European Court. She said:'This is an attempt to erase our Christian roots. They are trying to create a Europe without identity and tradition'"
    I think she has a good point, actually.

  5. With atheism becoming stronger, it calls for us to be more active and outward in our faith! We can shake our heads at others but that isn't going to do anything!
    It needs to start with us; we need to live out the Gospel each and every day of our lives.

  6. I'm heartened by the comment that the Vatican is carefully reading the ruling before making a response.
    Then it will be a considered one.....rather than a knee-jerk reaction which might miss working out some way of dealing with it.
    Having said that, I totally agree with the Italian official who commented that the crucifix was part of the country's cultural identity.
    I've just read an account of the appalling actions against Jewish people in a Balkans country (& a Catholic one, at that) during World War 2. The current fascist government there went all out to put in place the Nazi policy of exterminating the Jews, savagely.
    Battalions of the Italian army were there, because Italy was then an ally of Nazi Germany.
    But bless a movement among young Italian army officers. They were appalled by the savage, cold-blooded killing of men, women & children. And worked to circumvent it. They actually saved thousands of Jews, thanks to their Christian ideals.
    As they said, this is how Italians behave.
    I think the Italians have won the right to have crucifixes displayed in classrooms....& alongside them, the symbols of any other major religion which would join them in an ideal of mercy & compassion to their fellow human beings.

  7. They'll have to stop saying the "Our Father" in parliament then? What hogwash typical of political ideologues with no sense of reality. Cf pornographic images on billboards, truly offensive to many not just the religious.
    Beware these politically driven international courts.

  8. It just shows what 'human rights' legislation gets you: Atheistic government and society.
    Is that what (Fr) Frank Brennan wants us to embrace?

  9. This ruling is the end result of belonging to the European Union, make no mistake countries such as Poland who display the cross in the parliament, hospitals, and schools etc will soon be forced to remove such items, one may ask the question, who will benefit a charter of human rights, undoubtedly the anti-Christian elements in the world.

Bookmark and Share

More from this section

  1. Pharmaceutical company defends use of aborted fetus

    A statement by pharmaceutical company Neocutis defending of its use of cells harvested from an aborted fetus in the development of burn treatments and anti-ageing creams is being criticised as dishonest by a pro-life group.

  2. Pope John Paul II beatification soon

    The late Pope John Paul II could be beatified in the coming months, the mayor of Rome has been reported as saying, nudging him closer to sainthood.

  3. Miami bans Legionaries of Christ

    Miami Archbishop John Favalora has announced an immediate official ban on members of the Legionaries of Christ from exercising any ministry in the archdiocese.

  4. Elderly religious arrested in weapons protest

    US priest Father Bill "Bix" Bischel, 81, and Sister Anne Montgomery, 83 were hooded, handcuffed and held faced down on the ground for four hours before being arrested for a protest against nuclear weapons.

  5. Rode defends apostolic visitation

    Vatican Cardinal Franc Rodé has said the Holy See decided on the apostolic visitation of women religious in the USA after hearing "the concerns expressed by American Catholics - religious, laity, clergy and hierarchy."

Church Resources provides a range of services for the Church and not-for-profit sector, including aggregating buying power for a wide range of products and services used by health, welfare, aged care, education and parish organisations. More »

Subscribe

Receive CathNews headlines in your inbox daily.

News Feed

Subscribe to the CathNews RSS feed to get the daily edition automatically delivered to you.

Daily Prayer

Gospel Verse for 9 September 2010
"For the measure you give will be the measure you get back..." [Luke 6:38]

View Podcast