Make Text Larger Make Text Smaller Email this Article to a Friend Print this Article

Children's rights threatened by surrogacy bill: Family Council

Published: February 10, 2010

Dr David van Gend, spokesman Family Council of Queensland

---

Queensland's Surrogacy Bill violates a child's birthright to a mother and a father, says the Family Council of Queensland, and the Australian Christian Lobby wants the bill amended or rejected.

Children "are not pets and should not simply be given to anyone who wants one," says the ACL.

The State Parliament is set to vote Wednesday on the 2009 bill, which would decriminalise non-commercial surrogacy for both heterosexual and homosexual couples, and single people, Zenit reports.

"This Bill should have been about altruistic surrogacy as a 'last resort' for an infertile couple," the Family Council of Queensland said in a letter to the Parliament written by family doctor David van Gend. "But no, under that respectable cloak this bill smuggles in an oppressive proposal to deprive children of their birthright - their fundamental right to enter the world, as all of us did, with both a mother and a father.

"There is a grave necessity - and duty - to reject a bill that would, through normalizing same-sex and single surrogacy, intentionally and wantonly deprive a child of her birthright and her most profound psychological need: to have both a mother and a father."

The Family Council of Queensland has also launched a campaign called Kids Rights Count, which seeks to inform the public on how and why surrogacy of any type is harmful to children.

The ACL Managing Director Jim Wallace said in a statement that the Surrogacy Bill 2009 represents a piece of radical social engineering legislation which will alter the natural make-up of the family.

"The Bligh Government knocked back same-sex adoption, but is now going against the logic in that decision by creating situations where a surrogate child could end up with two mummies or two daddies or even just one parent - rightfrom birth," Mr Wallace said.

"This is experimenting with children's lives and at this stage they have no way of really knowing just how devastating the effects on the children will be, or the extent of identity confusion that will result. We've already had to make amends to a Stolen Generation and a Forgotten Generation - is this the next one?"

FULL STORY AND STATEMENT

Surrogacy seen as threat to children's rights (Zenit)

Children are not pets says Christian lobby (Australian Christian Lobby)

LINK

Family Council of Queensland - Kids Rights Count campaign

 

Response to articles is welcome. Simply follow the prompts to post your comment. No posting of more than 250 words will be published. While critical comment on stories and issues is welcomed, postings that descend to personal attacks on or impugn the integrity of other commentators will be blocked. Please use your own name, or initials, eg John Brown, or JB, or JAB, or Johnny. You are also required to add your location to the end of your email - as in, Sunshine, Victoria. Please provide your email address in the line supplied, followed by your contact phone number. These are requested for identification purposes only and will not be published. If you have any problems, please email news@cathnews.com

Recent Comments

  1. On the one hand we have possibly 100 000 unwanted Australian children being murdered every year, and on the other we have many thousands desiring children going to extraordinary lengths so that they may have children. This is all about unborn children having no rights and the right of any adult to treat the unborn as a possessable and disposable object.

  2. I hope our bishops take the opportunity to write a letter to all parishioners and explain the problem, urging them to write to pollies and papers exposing and decrying this evil and blatant attempt at social aka pagan engineering.

  3. Hand over heart 'social justice' activistas need to declare their hand as to whether or not they believe in individual and group rights for children to have both a mother and a father or whether they should be denied their human rights.

  4. Well said, David Van Gend and Jim Wallace. As one whose political home has been the Australian Left since my return from the Vietnam war a disillusioned and despairing young man, I am appalled that this legislation purports to come from left-wing ideology. Surrogacy as it now is framed is the ultimate in commoditisation of human life.
    What does that mean?
    Simply that children are to be regarded as things to be purchased or obtained principally to satisfy the wants of one or more adults - regardless of said adults responsibilities and obligations towards 'their' children.
    This is not social justice: this is a mockery of social justice. There is no equality of access to natural parents, no equality of opportunity for healthy social and emotional growth. No right of redress for a child' identity forfeited to the whims of the privileged adults involved.
    Without an identity, formed over time by the growing child, able to map his or her parentage and family roots, there is no anchor nor rudder with which to negotiate and navigate childhood, adolescence and later adult social life and relatioonships. Surrogacy is the ultimate alienation of an individual human being.
    Carried out in numbers, accepted as normal practice over a generation or two, surrogacy create alienated generations of children - who grow into alienated adults. These adults join the workforce, go to university, become decision makers themselves; in business, education, industry, public service, the military, politics, parliaments and government.
    Imagine big decisions affecting whole societies being made by surrogate adults who, knowing not where they come from, have no idea where they are going. How would we trust the judgement, compassion or political and social values of future decision makers, who learned from the behaviour and values of their surrogate parents' that each individual is always to prioritise their own personal needs and wants above all else?
    Can you imagine the Orwellian conversations of the future: 'Well, surrogacy didn't do me any harm; everyone should have children this way'?
    How many generations will it tke before natural childbirth becomes abnormal and even 'unnatural', and surrogate parenting becomes the norm?
    May God help them, because they will be powerless to help themselves.

  5. Are any of you women who have had to have hysterectomies for pregnancy complication? Are any of you women with serious kidney or heart problems who shouldn't fall pregnant but are desperate for a family? As usual your prejudice about same sex couples is clouding the real social issue. Women making reasonable personal decisions about the safety of becoming pregnant are being denied the possibility of motherhood. If you want to prevent termination then it is time condone surrogacy for women with major medical problems - these women would otherwise have to terminate a pregnancy or die. Instead they could have the baby they desperately want without putting their lives at risk.
    There is no way you can contemplate all of the possible reasons a person could want to have a surrogate baby. It is not your place to try.
    How dare any of you say this is about designer babies - it is much more than that but your prejudice will prevent women desperate to have a safe pregnancy from having any family at all.
    Many male/female couples are desperate for this law to go through and your prejudice against a minority will prevent them from achieving a family.

  6. Another confected self-centred 'right' that negates the real and natural basic rights of children. Another attempt to erode the dignity of human life and manipulate society.

  7. The Vatican already has the definitive document on the 'pastoral care of homosexual persons'.
    http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19861001_homosexual-persons_en.html
    Roma locuta est, causa finita est.

Bookmark and Share

More from this section

  1. Bishops online for Reflections this Lent

    The Australian Catholic Bishops Conference is offering "an innovative online experience" called "The Reflection" as a Lenten resource that presents reflections on the Gospel and the Creed. It starts on Monday.

  2. Trading scheme will hit aged care costs, says Catholic Health

    Services for pensioners in nursing homes could be squeezed without the right compensation package under the emissions trading scheme, Catholic Health Australia has warned.

  3. Brennan appointed advocate for disadvantaged, calls for rights charter

    Father Frank Brennan has been appointed as "Catholic Advocate in Residence" for four social justice bodies in a move to to drive change on the health and welfare of disadvantaged Australians.

  4. Catholic Health warning on non-profit fringe benefits removal

    Government funding for non-profit organisations must go up to enable the groups to deliver better community services and to pay their staff properly, said a Productivity Commission report.

  5. Vinnies welcomes weekly payment for poor

    The St Vincent de Paul Society has welcomed the Federal Government's move to allow disadvantaged people to access Centrelink payments weekly rather than fortnightly, but reiterated its opposition to compulsory income management.

Church Resources provides a range of services for the Church and not-for-profit sector, including aggregating buying power for a wide range of products and services used by health, welfare, aged care, education and parish organisations. More »

Subscribe

Receive CathNews headlines in your inbox daily.

News Feed

Subscribe to the CathNews RSS feed to get the daily edition automatically delivered to you.

Daily Prayer

Gospel Verse for 3 September 2010
"...no one puts new wine into old wineskins..." [Luke 5:37]

View Podcast