Make Text Larger Make Text Smaller Email this Article to a Friend Print this Article

Jesuit says Australia was more humane before 2001

Published: June 22, 2010

Jesuit human rights advocate Father Frank Brennan has argued that Australia should return to the pre-2001 practice of accepting refugees arriving through Indonesia as Australia's responsibility.

In an address delivered last week at Curtin University, Perth, and published in Eureka Street yesterday, he said that the Howard Government took the view that refugees coming by boat from far-flung countries who stopped off in Malaysia or Indonesia were no longer engaged in direct flight from persecution.


"Rather they had fled persecution, found a modicum of protection in another country, and then decided to engage in secondary movement seeking a more benign migration outcome."

In his identifying 2001 as a regrettable turning point in Australia's refugee policy, he also discussed the Howard Government's nexus between the number of successful onshore asylum claims and the number of places available for humanitarian offshore cases. The nexus implies that every successful onshore asylum seeker takes a place that would have been available to an offshore humanitarian applicant.

"Refugee advocates unsuccessfully argued that even those countries without a net migration program would be required to provide a durable solution for refugees within their jurisdiction, and that therefore there should be no nexus.

"There is presently no strong community demand for the nexus once again to be broken. The nexus is judged by the community to be morally acceptable as well as politically expedient."

"As the election lather on the issue commences, let's always ask, 'Why is it right to treat the honest, unvisaed boat person more harshly than the visaed airplane passenger who fails to declare their intention to apply for asylum?' If the answer is based only on consequences, then ask, 'Would not the same harsh treatment of the visaed airplane passenger have the same or even greater effect in deterring arrivals by onshore asylum seekers?' The Qantas 747 does not evoke the same response as the leaky boat, does it?"

FULL STORY

The 747 or the leaky boat (Eureka Street)

PHOTO CREDIT

Indy Kethdy on Flickr

Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic

 

Response to articles is welcome. Simply follow the prompts to post your comment. No posting of more than 250 words will be published. While critical comment on stories and issues is welcomed, postings that descend to personal attacks on or impugn the integrity of other commentators will be blocked. Please use your own name, or initials, eg John Brown, or JB, or JAB, or Johnny. You are also required to add your location - as in, Sunshine, Victoria. Please provide your email address in the line supplied, followed by your contact phone number. These are requested for identification purposes only and will not be published. If you have any problems, please email news@cathnews.com


 


Recent Comments

  1. Thank you, Frank, very much for your fine reflection and intervention on the politics of refugees and asylum seekers. At our peril we would forget that Moses, Jesus and Mohammed were all refugees!

  2. I am glad some of these points are being raised. A difference between the 747 passenger,o r more importantly the refugee who is selected based on need alone, not the propensity to cross oceans in organised migration, is the cost, financial, to process these arrivals.
    This,a t the moment, is reputed to be of the order of $85000, per head. Apart from any suffering and loss of life caused by this migration, it all ends in a zero sum game where parliament accepts 12000 or so refugees anyway.
    We need to advocate a needs based refugee scheme, with a priority for those countries in which we have waged war or intervened with police actions.
    Only then may the very poor, stuck in African, Asian and Middle Eastern camps,with no money or hope, have any chance of getting out.

  3. David Timbs: It seems to me more perilous to lump Moses, Mohammed and Jesus into the one reductive basket and simplify their religious significance to a merely secular category.
    Among other things, it does no justice to Judaic and Islamic belief, let alone Christology as held by the Church, as distinct from Liberation Theology founded on neo-Marxian principles.

  4. John Kelly: Moses, Jesus and Mohammed were refugees regardless of what you have to say about reducing their religious significance to a merely secular category.
    No religious tradition is worth its salt unless it engages with and brings real change within secular society.
    In regard to your broad brush dismissal of Liberation Theology being founded on neo-Marxist principles, I suggest the 'straw man' has reappeared.
    At the very least, you might read Luke 4: 18-19. Here Jesus proclaimed in public the agenda of his Gospel mission. You might also read the works of Fr Gustavo Gutierrez OP in which he expressly states that the power of the Christian message to society comes not out of the barrel of a gun but from the teaching of Jesus Christ.
    You might also recall thetelling apologia of the late Archbishop Helder Camara: When I give bread to the hungry they call me a saint; when I ask 'why the hungry have no bread?', they call me a Communist.
    Don't forget Archbishop Oscar Romero either. He was shot dead while celebrating the Eucharist for preaching such a dangerous Gospel. These were not 'paper tigers' or traffickers of religious opiates! Look at the price they paid for their Gospel integrty.

  5. David Timbs: I am familiar with the three you figures you mention, but distinguish between their understanding of and commitment to Liberation Theology as such. The two Archbishops were not Liberation Theologians; they did not subscribe to the neo-Marxist ideology which underpins it. I refer you the extended discussion between MJ and me several months ago on this topic, and to the Featured website posted by CathNews on this subject.
    I refer you, more significantly, to the then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger's instruction on the same.

  6. John Kelly: Literary helps. I did not say that the two Archbishops mentioned were proponents of Liberation Theology.
    They were, however, fearless preachers of the Kingdom of God and its ethic of Justice for all. Both suffered greatly for their courageous solidarity with God's People.
    It is clear to me that your knowledge of Liberation Theology is not sound. Both Christians and Marxists saw exactly the same social challenges; the latter group advocated a solution of counter bloodshed and violence whilst the former proclaimed the Gospel as the only authentic path to Justice. Its tactics were not bullets but name and shame.
    I bet Cd Ratzinger was cheering for Solidarity in Poland when there were vigorous protests there.
    As for the rest of your references, they are yours to dine out on. My response is to you.

Bookmark and Share

More from this section

  1. Viability of NSW ethics classes in question

    A Wollongong diocesan official has stressed that training catechists to ensure they conduct engaging and effective classes is critical, adding that it is uncertain that proposed ethics classes in NSW state schools will be adequately resourced.

  2. Jesuit Refugee Service says don't forget urban refugees

    Jesuit Refugee Service has reminded governments that urban refugees share all of the challenges of the urban poor, but often face additional barriers due to their uncertain legal status and lack of documentation.

  3. Intolerance to Asperger's could force boy out of school

    Alleged parental and student intolerance could force a bullied Melbourne Catholic school boy with Asperger's syndrome to change schools.

  4. Hobart archbishop says euthanasia diverts care efforts

    Archbishop Adrian Doyle of Hobart has said that spending taxpayer's money on developing euthanasia legislation is at the cost of other care initiatives.

  5. Wilson says Thomas More looked beyond 'terrible things' that happened in the Church

    Archbishop Philip Wilson, President of the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference, has told a Canberra forum that the inspiration of St Thomas More gives the Church strength to face challenges when things go wrong.

Church Resources provides a range of services for the Church and not-for-profit sector, including aggregating buying power for a wide range of products and services used by health, welfare, aged care, education and parish organisations. More »

Mass streamed live daily

From Our Lady of the Rosary Cathedral, Waitara, in the Broken Bay Diocese.
Weekdays live at 9.30am
Saturdays live 9.30am (followed by Adoration and Benediction)
Sundays live 9.30am
Click on this link at the appropriate time to connect.

Subscribe

To receive headlines from our faith-based news services, please subscribe below.

Email address

Newsletter


 

News Feed

Subscribe to the CathNews RSS feed to get the daily edition automatically delivered to you.
Subscribe to Faith Project RSS.