Make Text Larger Make Text Smaller Email this Article to a Friend Print this Article

Feature - Why the Lord's Prayer is misunderstood

Published: October 25, 2010

John Dominic Crossan is arguably the world’s foremost scholar of the historical Jesus. Twenty-five years ago, Crossan co-founded the Jesus Seminar with Robert Funk, a group of mostly liberal scholars who decide on the historicity of the deeds and sayings of Jesus.

A former Roman Catholic priest and professor emeritus of religious studies at DePaul University, Crossan newest book, his 26th, looks at the Lord’s Prayer, or the Our Father. In The Greatest Prayer, Crossan argues that Christianity’s best-known invocation is misunderstood and undervalued in today’s society.

Q: You call the Lord’s Prayer Christianity’s “greatest prayer,” but also say it can be prayed by followers of all religions. Why would non-Christians recite it?

A: Any religion’s greatest prayers should be addressed to the whole world. If a prayer only speaks to you, that’s fine. But I would like to hear you speaking to all of us. The Lord’s Prayer is the greatest because it comes from the heart of Judaism and the lips of Christianity—but speaks to the conscience of the world.

Q: You also call it Christianity’s “strangest” prayer.

A: Ask a Christian what’s the most important things about Christianity, and see if you find those in the Lord’s Prayer. When Christians emphasize what’s most important for them, it’s usually not in the Lord’s Prayer, and they almost never mention that “give us this day our daily bread” means exactly that—that everyone has a right to the material basis of life. It’s “strange” in that there’s a huge discrepancy between what most people think Christianity is really about and what Jesus thinks Christianity is really about.

Q: The Lord’s Prayer addresses God as “Father.” Is that a turn-off for women?

A: It is, and they’re going to have to learn, as we all have to, what is meant by people who use a different culture than our own. Sheep and shepherds don’t do much for me, but I will allow ancient people the validity of their language.

FULL STORY  10 Minutes with John Dominic Crossan (Religion News Service)

 

Response to articles is welcome. Simply follow the prompts to post your comment. No posting of more than 250 words will be published. While critical comment on stories and issues is welcomed, postings that descend to personal attacks on or impugn the integrity of other commentators will be blocked. Please use your own name, or initials, eg John Brown, or JB, or JAB, or Johnny. You are also required to add your location - as in, Sunshine, Victoria. Please provide your email address in the line supplied, followed by your contact phone number. These are requested for identification purposes only and will not be published. If you have any problems, please email news@cathnews.com


 


Recent Comments

  1. The Lord's Prayer is an essential corrective to our delight in unnecessary rubrical burdens, esoteric speculations, and exclusivism.

  2. 'John Dominic Crossan is arguably the world’s foremost scholar of the historical Jesus.'
    I would certainly argue this point. I prefer the Gospel version of Jesus - the divine Son of God who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, performed miracles, and rose from the dead.
    We shouldn't be idolising ivory tower academics who seek public adulation through re-defining Jesus in their own biassed image.

  3. Robert Haddad: Now that we know what your preferences are, and having listened to your rendition of part of the Nicene Creed, you might also bring yourself to acknowledge the fact that we only know of Jesus Christ through the written and oral communication of Christians.
    They didn't exist in a vacuum. The Christian Scriptures came out of discrete social and historical contexts.
    It has been the work of Crossan and other international scholars to investigate the earliest received meanings of the preaching of Jesus. A vast amount of this preserved memory is to be found in the writings of 'biassed, ivory towered' Christian Arabs from the 5th century.
    They beggged no adulation but we owe them for keeping the Memory alive. Alhumdulillah! Don't mock what you should know.

  4. I would also argue the point of Crossan allegedly being the foremost scholar of the historical Jesus.
    He is yet another example of someone constructing Jesus to fit his own image.
    If you want a more accurate picture of the historical Jesus, who is none other than the 'Christ of faith', then read Benedict XVI's Jesus of Nazareth. We need look no further for the world's foremost theological scholar than our own Holy Father.
    Also, as a woman I have no problem with saying 'Our Father' and would argue that Crossan completely saps the filial relationship of its essential intimacy by proposing the substitution of Father with Householder, or even more ridiculously the 'Big Householder in the Sky'. If Crossan is indeed seen as a foremost Biblical scholar, then Heaven help us!

  5. I found it rather ironic that the blurb introducing John Dominic Crossan's ideas on the Lord's prayer should refer to him as 'arguably the world’s foremost scholar of the historical Jesus.'
    Crossan is a co-director of the ‘Jesus Seminar’ whose scholars have concluded that over 82 percent of what Jesus said in the Gospels is not historically accurate; and that of the 176 deeds of Jesus recounted in the Gospels, only 10 are historical. They assert that Jesus did not rise from the dead and that his death had no salvific significance.
    One of the presuppositions of the Jesus Seminar is ‘Scientific Naturalism’ which holds that anything incapable of natural explanation cannot have historical evidence to substantiate it. A presupposition is a starting assumption adopted before looking at the evidence which determines how you interpret it. Blessed John Henry Newman held that a fundamental cause of radical differences of belief was that of different starting points, which is to say in fundamental assumptions. Given its adoption of scientific naturalism as a starting point, the Jesus Seminar had already concluded before conducting its research that the miracles of Jesus as recorded in the Gospels could not have occurred.
    Crossan himself asserts that the accounts of the Passion and Resurrection of Our Lord given in the Gospels are historically invalid and that there was no Virgin birth. He postulates that Jesus’ body was not placed in a tomb after his crucifixion, but rather was probably “eaten by scavenger dogs, crows or other wild beasts.”
    Crossan further asserts that Catholic teaching on the origin and nature of the Eucharist is erroneous and that St Paul took over the tradition concerning the Last Supper from pagans in Asia Minor.
    On the basis of a lack of correspondence he believes exists between the account of the Eucharistic celebration given in Didache 9-10 and 1 Corinthians 10-11, Crossan concludes as follows: “It is simply that their dual existence renders most unlikely a Last Supper with its passion symbolism institutionalized and commanded to repetition by Jesus himself on the eve of his death” (The Historical Jesus, p. 364).
    What is at stake in Crossan’s assertion that the New Testament accounts of the Last Supper are not historically reliable is the difference between a Church with the ministerial priesthood and Eucharist Sacrifice and a church without them.

  6. Eamonn Keane: Well said! David Timbs, please take note. As for my preferences, David, they can be summarised in one word - Catholicism.

  7. It's the work of scripture scholars like John Dominic Crossan that's enabled me and many like me to continue to believe, and believe joyfully, in Christ incarnate in the world.
    What a relief it was, many years ago, to realize that we don't have to surrender our intelligence and even common sense to be a believer. I don't see where JD Crossan 'proposes the substitution of 'Father' with 'householder', S.N. Smith.
    Nor do I see where recognizing Crossan as a fine scripture scholar detracts from the Pope as a fine theologian. They're not the same thing, you know.

  8. Robert Haddad: Your brand of Catholicism and I think it is of the drum-beating, hollow sounding variety.
    Eamonn Keane: Whatever else about the minimalism of Crossan and the 'Jesus Seminar,' they are hardly worse than the crowd who argue their debates from the heavy weight stuff found in the Catechism and 'reliable' Catholic newspapers. Even Crossan brought much light from 'The Dark Interval.'
    Look at the very valuable work done by Bruce Malina and associates of the 'Context Group.'
    In their studies of ancient Near Eastern clan cultures and life, they have provided us with a 'cosmos' in which the teaching of Jesus take on startling and refreshing meaning. This needs to be acknowledged and, I think, generously.

Bookmark and Share

More from this section

  1. Feature- The wisdom of staying put in a mobile world

    American author Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove (pictured) has discovered the spiritual benefits of stability in our hyper-mobile society.

  2. Featured website - Gaudi club

    Since the Spanish architect Antonio Gaudí was neither a priest nor a member of a religious order, nobody officially started up his beatification when he died in 1926. This website, of the Association for the Beatification of Antoni Gaudí, has everything you need to know about this process.

  3. Opinon - To fight crime, attack poverty first

    While visiting the Broome Regional Prison many years ago, I was called into one cell. The inmates had written a new song,which hinted that it was most certainly safer on the inside than outside, writes Bishop Christopher Saunders, Chairman of the Australian Catholic Social Justice Council.

  4. What's On - Parramatta Diocese celebration for Mary MacKillop

    More than 1500 people are expected to join Bishop Anthony Fisher OP, the Bishop of Parramatta, this Sunday, for a Eucharistic celebration of Australia's first saint, St Mary of the Cross MacKillop.

  5. Feature - Anglicans on the difficult road to Rome

    A flying bishop and a small parish in Folkestone, England (pictured) are the first of the Church of England rebels ready to turn their backs on Canterbury and make for Rome via the special structure of an ordinariate. But could progress be stymied by salaries, pensions and buildings, asks The Tablet.

Church Resources provides a range of services for the Church and not-for-profit sector, including aggregating buying power for a wide range of products and services used by health, welfare, aged care, education and parish organisations. More »

Mass streamed live daily

From Our Lady of the Rosary Cathedral, Waitara, in the Broken Bay Diocese.
Weekdays live at 9.30am
Saturdays live 9.30am (followed by Adoration and Benediction)
Sundays live 9.30am
Click on this link at the appropriate time to connect.

Subscribe

To receive headlines from our faith-based news services, please subscribe below.

Email address

Newsletter


 

News Feed

Subscribe to the CathNews RSS feed to get the daily edition automatically delivered to you.
Subscribe to Faith Project RSS.