Make Text Larger Make Text Smaller Email this Article to a Friend Print this Article

National apology needed over forced adoptions, says CHA

Published: February 29, 2012

Catholic Health Australia (CHA) has endorsed a key recommendation of the Senate Inquiry report into past adoption practices that proposes a national apology, the organisation said in a statement.

CHA is also calling on state and territory government community services ministers to adopt the Senate's action plan when they meet on March 30.

CHA chief executive officer Martin Laverty said he is pleased that many of the recommendations his organisation made to the Inquiry have been embraced because "we think they are concrete steps that can help those affected by past adoption practices move towards healing."

Catholic Health Australia last year issued an apology to those "who carry broken hearts as a result of the role that some Catholic organisations played in this widespread, common public policy practice of years past".

Mr Laverty proposed to the community and disability service ministers of all states and territories a four-step plan to help progress the healing process for those affected by past adoption policies:

  • A new nationally co-ordinated program involving all governments and non-government agencies involved in past adoptions to facilitate improved access to medical, birth and social work records;
  • A national funding program supporting access to tailored counselling that is focused on the differing needs of mothers, fathers, adopted children, their siblings and parents who have cared for adopted children;
  • A national process supported by all governments enabling those birth mothers with grievances about their birth experience or consent procedure that led to their child being adopted to have those grievances heard;
  • A national apology supported by all governments, recognising that the Western Australian Government has already taken this step.

FULL STORY

National apology for past adoptions first step towards healing (Media Release)

Joint call for nation to apologise over forced adoptions (Sydney Morning Herald)

PHOTO CREDIT 

sabianmaggy on Flickr

Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

 

Response to articles is welcome. Simply follow the prompts to post your comment. No posting of more than 250 words will be published. While critical comment on stories and issues is welcomed, postings that descend to personal attacks on or impugn the integrity of other commentators will be blocked. Please use your own name, or initials, eg John Brown, or JB, or JAB, or Johnny. You are also required to add your location - as in, Sunshine, Victoria. Please provide your email address in the line supplied, followed by your contact phone number. These are requested for identification purposes only and will not be published. If you have any problems, please email news@cathnews.com


 


Recent Comments

  1. Apology, apology for being Christian and assisting young women to get on and live a full life; we adopted two children whose mothers wished them to go to a loving family who have cared and brought up our children to be wonderful adults and now share their journey with their children.
    Do we stop what we belive to be right today to not offend anyone in the future?
    That is what is going to happen.

  2. I am a mother who lost her child at a Catholic Hospital in 1967.
    I submitted my story to the Senate Inquiry.
    I didn't ask for an apology, I didn't ask for compensation but I did ask that these practices be classed as illegal.
    The Senate was quite clear that the way I lost my baby was illegal and unlawful.
    One has to sign a consent showing that they relinguish all rights to the child, they have to sign a form that says they have 30 days to revoke consent.
    I did neither of these, and therefore the adoption was illegal.
    On my papers, it says I was very emotionally disturbed - a social worker's comments - so how could a signature on the wrong form be classed as legal when the mother was not in a fit state to even blow her nose.
    My child was stolen to provide a baby for an infertile couple.
    I was deemed not fit to be its mother because I was single but the woman who adopted my child was considered fit because she was married but had already been diagnosed with a mental illness.
    Ask me how I know this? I have all information from Supreme Court.
    I know adopters fought against records being opened, but mine were very enlightening and have allowed me to see just how my child was stolen.

  3. I am old enough to remember the 40s, 50s, 60s, and especially the last when I lived in a big country town.
    There I saw what was a fairly common situation - a young girl would become pregnant and would disappear to the 'big smoke' for a few months to 'work&' returning single and settling down.
    It was just about the only course open to her in those days of no support for pregnant women, no work for single mothers, and the stigma of being pregnant in a country town.
    I also visited Crown St Women's hospital where I asked what was the segregated area near the usual maternity wards - I was told it was for girls waiting to have their babies and in the meantime they worked for the hospital until the birth, followed by adoption.
    This all leads me to: these girls from the country towns and waiting births in various hospitals knew what was happening.
    They knew that there was not or seldom was an option for them other than adoption. They took this option.
    Was this forcing them to give up their babies or were the babies 'stolen' from them?

Bookmark and Share

More from this section

  1. Three cabinet ministers from St Pat's Strathfield

    St Patrick's College in Strathfield, Sydney, can proudly boast to have three present Federal Cabinet Ministers in Tony Burke,Craig Emerson and Martin Ferguson as old boys, reports The Catholic Weekly.

  2. Monsignor Cappo calls for action on disabled

    Monsignor David Cappo has described a skyrocketing number of people in urgent need of disability services as "totally unacceptable", reports AdelaideNow from The Advertiser.

  3. Asylum seekers have 'right to liberty and security': ERC

    The Edmund Rice Centre has expressed distress about the death of a detained Iranian asylum seeker this week, at the Liverpool Hospital in NSW, the Centre said in a statement.

  4. Safety of children 'fundamental' to Church: Archbishop

    The Archbishop of Melbourne, Denis Hart said in a statement that the Church will examine and respond to the report of the Protecting Victoria's Vulnerable Children Inquiry, which was tabled in the state Parliament this week.

  5. CHA calls for national apology over forced adoptions

    Victims of forced adoption should receive a national apology when a federal parliamentary inquiry hands down its report tomorrow, says Catholic Health Australia, reports The Australian.

Church Resources provides a range of services for the Church and not-for-profit sector, including aggregating buying power for a wide range of products and services used by health, welfare, aged care, education and parish organisations. More »

Mass streamed live daily

From Our Lady of the Rosary Cathedral, Waitara, in the Broken Bay Diocese.
Weekdays live at 9.30am
Saturdays live 9.30am (followed by Adoration and Benediction)
Sundays live 9.30am
Click on this link at the appropriate time to connect.

Subscribe

To receive headlines from our faith-based news services, please subscribe below.

Email address

Newsletter


 

News Feed

Subscribe to the CathNews RSS feed to get the daily edition automatically delivered to you.
Subscribe to Faith Project RSS.